Following up on Temasek Holdings again..
--
http://business.asiaone.com/Business/Ne ... 88094.html
..
For the year, Temasek's total return to its shareholder, the Government, was a "modest" 4.6 per cent, said the investment company.
...
With such liquidity, TH only return 4.6%.
Going back in time, the govt (LHL?) have said that in the years ahead, it is not possible to see growth of double digit growth for the GDP . They are targeting 3% and 5% if SG is lucky.
Let's stretch the discussion a bit further. I assume the SRS that the govt. sell to CPF come with some kind of return. To me, it is like a bond (<< Please correct me if I am wrong). Most of the money from the CPF would have come from the baby boomers prime years. These SRS will be sold to CPF during in the 80s (when SG was still experiencing high growth).
So, the question is, what kind of returns does SRS promise to CPF? If SG is growing at 8% at that time, surely SRS will need to promise 10% or more in returns. Or it could be a fixed 8% plus variable. If not, why would CPF even bother to buy those SRS?
Using this as a basis for further discussion, with TH 4.6% returns, is this figure enough to pay CPF when the time comes?
Note:
We have occasionally discuss how pension funds from overseas face redemption. Likewise, CPF faces the same issue. And at some point, various batch of SRS will mature and face redemption.
How is this being handled? For GIC and TH, what returns are they targeting in order to ensure that they stay ahead of CPF redemption?