Not vested. From Kim Eng:-
CapitaMalls Asia: Malls and more (IPO price S$2.12\UNRATED)
Brandon Lee (6232 3891,
[email protected])
Jonathan Ng (6232 3893,
[email protected])
Valuations undemanding for CMA. CMA’s listing on 25 Nov 09 signifies the birth of Asia’s largest retail mall developer/manager. Aside from replicating CapitaLand’s well-honed capital recycling model, CMA is a beneficiary of Asia’s unparalled consumer growth story, particularly China.
At 1.55x P/B, IPO price of S$2.12 appears undemanding, vs. our valuation range of
S$2.42 - 3.01.Birth of pan-Asian retail behemoth. With a retail portfolio of 86 assets (66.5m sqf in GFA) across five countries and 48 cities, CapitaMalls Asia offers the best proxy to Asia’s significant economic and consumer growth story. CMA’s unique integrated retail mall business model combines its peerless mall development and management skills, with a proven asset and fund management expertise. This should add a new dimension to investors’ stock selection.
China to spearhead growth, Singapore as pivot. We expect China to drive CMA’s growth, given that it makes up 65% of CMA’s portfolio in terms of GFA.
We believe this can be achieved via:-
(1) gains from divestment of malls with stabilised income and
(2) organic rental growth due to reasonable upside potential as evidenced by NPI yields of 5.7% vs. targeted 7 -9%.
Stabilised income from Singapore’s malls should provide solid support.
Valuation range of S$2.42 - 3.01 based on 1.2 - 1.3x SOTP of S$2.01 - 2.32. Our bottom-up SOTP analysis has engendered a valuation range for CMA’s business quivalent to 1.8 - 2.2x Sep-09 book value. This is between 14 - 42% above its IPO price of S$2.12.
Our RNAV estimate is based on the market value of its listed entities, a 14 - 20x P/E multiple for its fund/asset management business and forecast capital growth for Singapore, Malaysia and China malls.
Valuation in-line with global peers. Our P/NAV is within the valuation range of regional retail property companies. We set out in Figure 3 some listed comparables, i.e. Hang Lung (HK), Westfield (AUS), Simon Property Group (US), Lend Lease (AUS) and Central Pattana (THAI).
The weighted P/NAV of these comparables works out to 2.5x. In contrast, SG retail REITs like CMT, CRCT, FCT and SGREIT trade at weighted average of parity to their NAVs.
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"