Diversification or diworsification?
Charles Munger said : "Diversification is the hobgoblin of small minds with little confidence".
This prof said @MarketWatch
"Diversification has been sold as something that would prevent losses," added Meir Statman, a finance professor at the Santa Clara University in California. "That's nonsense. What diversification means is that if you divide your money between various assets, you will not have all of your money in the crummiest assets. You are in the middle, and in the middle doesn't mean it's going to be positive."
And I think he said that hedging is the way to prevent or minimize losses in last Sat's Biz Times.
IMHO, hedging merely restores one's position to a neutral position and so it doesn't mean it's going to be positive or asset-enhancing.
Same prof said :
The market's losses in 2008 shook the fundamentals of asset allocation. Stocks for the long run? Forget it. Too much in bonds? Not possible.
In fact, your mix of stocks, bonds, cash and alternative investments affects total return more than the individual investments you choose. Moreover, a portfolio that accurately reflects your ability to handle volatile market conditions will smooth your ride down Wall Street.
I subscribe to this view. I'm heavily invested in properties as I'm long on properties. When I sense a collapse of the equities market in 2007, I fully liquidated my equity portfolio and re-entered in March 2009. Asset allocation is the KEY to consistently good returns.