by millionairemind » Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:54 am
ublished January 21, 2009
Obama clean air plan gives car industry the jitters
States may enforce own greenhouse-gas emission standards
(LOS ANGELES) If the car industry thinks it has problems now, wait until Barack Obama takes the wheel.
Complying with the California guidelines would create technology burden that could add up to US$5,000 to the cost of each vehicle.
Not long after assuming the presidency, Mr Obama is expected to grant a waiver allowing more than 13 states to enforce their own greenhouse-gas emissions standards on cars.
That would completely change the landscape for vehicle regulation and obligate carmakers to produce cars that are far more efficient than those called for under current federal standards - an average of 3 miles per gallon (1.28 km/litre) more by 2015, and 7 mpg by 2020, according to some calculations.
Environmentalists and state regulators say the rules are key to combating global warming, and point to a series of court rulings backing their implementation.
'This is an essential piece of the nation's environmental strategy,' said Tim Carmichael, president of the Coalition for Clean Air. Environmentalists estimate that cars create about a quarter of US carbon emissions.
But it's a nightmare scenario for carmakers, which argue that complying with the California guidelines would create regulatory headaches and a technology burden that could add at least US$1,000 and as much as US$5,000 to the cost of each vehicle.
As such, the prospect of the waiver is creating a fierce debate about automotive regulation, pitting concerns about the environment against the deeply troubled finances of an industry that has thrown itself at the mercy of Washington just to remain solvent.
GM and other carmakers, including foreign brands like Toyota and Honda, have vigorously opposed implementation of the California rule and have fought it in court for years.
Nonetheless, their efforts have provoked judicial rulings in four different federal courts that open the door to California - along with 17 states that have also adopted the Golden State's rules - regulating its own carbon emissions under a 2002 law.
The final barrier to implementation, a waiver from the Environmental Protection Agency, was held up a year ago when the Bush administration denied the request. California then sued the EPA, a congressional investigation was launched and during the campaign, Mr Obama pledged to grant the waiver if he became president.
According to Mary Nichols, chair of California's Air Resources Board - the agency that would implement and enforce the regulation - the likelihood of getting the waiver is 'over 95 per cent.' She said that Mr Obama's transition team has 'had conversations' with her agency to coordinate how and when the waiver should be granted.
'A plan of action is already pretty much in hand,' she said.
Last week, Lisa Jackson, Mr Obama's nominee to head the EPA, addressed the emissions issue as well. 'If I am confirmed, I will immediately revisit the waiver,' she said.
Currently, the only standard that carmakers have to meet is Corporate Average Fuel Economy. Slightly more than a year ago Congress passed a law that will ramp up the national average fuel economy for cars and trucks. Final rules for implementing the new standard have not been issued - the outgoing administration threw that football to Mr Obama earlier this month - but the law calls for a fleet-wide average of 35 mpg by 2020.
That's a substantial increase from the previous standard of 27.5 mpg for cars and 22.5 mpg for trucks, but pales in comparison to the California rule.
Under it, carmakers have to show a 30 per cent overall reduction in greenhouse gas emissions on their vehicles by 2016. That's the same kind of regulation employed in Europe and Japan, where cars have strict emissions requirements but not specific mileage standards. -- LAT-WP
"If a speculator is correct half of the time, he is hitting a good average. Even being right 3 or 4 times out of 10 should yield a person a fortune if he has the sense to cut his losses quickly on the ventures where he has been wrong" - Bernard Baruch
Disclaimer - The author may at times own some of the stocks mentioned in this forum. All discussions are NOT to be construed as buy/sell recommendations. Readers are advised to do their own research and analysis.