vested
Analyst Explains Why She Trimmed Her Meta Platforms (META) Stake – ‘It’s Prudent’by Fahad Saleem
Most of the reason that we trim them is because they were so large as positions in our portfolios. So these are stocks that we’ve been overweight for years and that overweight has expanded and expanded.
It’s prudent to just reduce that when we look at just what’s happened with the market and also earnings growth is likely to slow somewhat.
Still going to be decent, but we’ve had such enormous gains in earnings over the last few quarters,” Firestone said.
With daily active users of about 3.48 billion, Meta’s huge edge in the AI race is the data and user base it has access to, which is extremely useful for ads targeting and monetization.
In 2024, digital advertising accounted for about 98% of the company’s total revenue. The business is thriving for now.
In the June quarter, price per ad rose 9% year over year, reflecting higher returns for advertisers and a favorable supply and demand balance for Meta.
Between 2014 and 2019, digital advertising rose about 20% annually, but growth is now expected to slow to 9% per year from 2025 through 2030.
Meta is expected to spend about $60 billion to $65 billion in 2025 on capital expenditures to expand its artificial intelligence infrastructure.
Source: Insider Monkey
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/analyst- ... 17492.html
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"