by winston » Wed Jul 16, 2008 4:59 pm
The Atheist and the Apologist by Alexander Green
Last weekend, I had the honor of refereeing "The Friday Night Fight" at Bally's in Las Vegas.
The two contenders?
In one corner, weighing in at a trim 142 pounds, was Dinesh D'Souza, a Robert and Karen Rishwain Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and author of several best-selling books including, most recently, "What's So Great About Christianity." (Note the absence of a question mark in the title. Mr. D'Souza is a Christian apologist.)
In the other corner, weighing in at a brawny 174 pounds, was Christopher Hitchens, contributing editor of The Atlantic Monthly and Vanity Fair and also the author of several best-selling books including, most recently, "God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything." (Mr. Hitchens, as you may have surmised, is a confirmed atheist.)
The debate was part of FreedomFest, billed as "The World's Largest Gathering of Free Minds." Over four days, we heard more than 70 speakers offer various views on investing, politics, history, religion, philosophy, science, medicine and the arts.
This was the final debate of the conference. The resolution was "War, Terrorism and Geo-Political Crisis: Is Religion the Solution or the Problem?"
I told our two pugilists that while we expected a "spirited" debate - pardon the pun - we wanted this to be a fair fight, a clean fight. So I warned them that I would tolerate "no head butts, no ear-pulling, no eye-gouging, no biting, no slapping, no gagging, no faking an injury, no attacks to the windpipe, no neck cranks, no spine locks, no fish-hooking, no hair-pulling, no groin strikes, no toe locks, no grabbing the throat, no punches to the head, no distracting the referee, no escaping the ring, and no unsportsmanlike conduct."
They both nodded, although Hitchens drew a laugh from the audience when he feigned a backhand to D'Souza's head on the way to the podium.
Over the next 90 minutes, the two combatants mesmerized the audience with provocative, enlightening, and frequently amusing arguments. D'Souza argued passionately that religion provides us with a set of values and an animating sense of purpose. Hitchens retorted that whatever benefits religion may provide, it is at the root of much of the intolerance, war and terrorism that exists around the world today.
Few would disagree on these points. However, their other differences could not be reconciled, to put it mildly. A vote at the end of the debate showed the audience of 1,400 was pretty evenly split. (Hitchens conceded the victory to D'Souza, however, offering that he appeared to have won a slight majority.)
Afterwards, I joined Hitchens and D'Souza for dinner at Le Cirque across the street at the Bellagio. And I had to chuckle inside as I watched these two slap each other on the back, inquire about each other's families and catch up on where they'd been.
Here were two men whose views on religion could hardy be more opposite. Yet they genuinely like, admire and respect each other.
Maybe there is a lesson here for the rest of us. Rather than focusing on our differences, perhaps we can search for common ground.
This is exactly what Jeffrey Moses proposes in his book "Oneness: Great Principles Shared By All Religions."
Moses points out that the world's spiritual truths are shared by all religions and by people of conscience everywhere. The Golden Rule is a good example:
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Christianity
What is hurtful to yourself do not to your fellow man. That is the whole of the Torah and the remainder is but commentary.
Judaism
Do unto all men as you would wish to have done unto you; and reject for others what you would reject for yourselves.
Islam
Hurt not others with that which pains yourself.
Buddhism
This is the sum of all true righteousness
Treat others, as thou wouldst thyself be treated.
Do nothing to thy neighbor, which hereafter
Thou wouldst not have thy neighbor do to thee.
Hinduism
Of course, some fanatical groups - not only today but throughout history - have ignored or subverted this universal truth. They have strayed - often in murderous ways - from their own principles. Yet as religion scholar Karen Armstrong has devoted her career to making clear, the essence of true religion is compassion:
It is more blessed to give than to receive.
Christianity
Extend your help without seeking reward. Give to others and do not regret or begrudge your liberality.
Taoism
Bounteous is he who gives to the beggar who comes to him in want of food and feeble.
Hinduism
Blessed is he that considereth the poor.
Judaism
The poor, the orphan, the captive - feed them for the love of God alone, desiring no reward, nor even thanks.
Islam
As Moses writes, "The great sayings are like a guide or blueprint for the inner development of mind and spirit that allows a person to achieve his highest goals. These principles are the foundation for success in personal relationships with family and friends, for satisfaction and success in business activities, and for that final aspiration in life that each person ultimately desires - the achievement of inner peace extending beyond the confines of an individual lifetime."
Of course, it is not enough to simply acknowledge this. We have to act on it. We determine who we are not by what we believe, but by what we do. This simple truth can be found across all of the world's major religions:
By their fruits ye may know them.
Christianity
Students and teachers, and all others,
Who read the mere words of ponderous
------books, know nothing,
But only waste their time in vain pursuit
------of words;
He who acts righteously is wise.
Hinduism
Not learning but doing is the chief thing.
Judaism
A man asked Muhammad how to tell when one is truly faithful, and he replied: "If you derive pleasure from the good which you do and are grieved by the evil which you commit, then you are a true believer."
Islam
Like a beautiful flower, full of color, but without scent, are the fine but fruitless words of him who does not act accordingly.
Buddhism
"These great principles are not limiting to a person's satisfaction and fulfillment," says Moses. "Instead, they are guidelines that enable men and women to evolve to the highest point of human consciousness... These principles stretch beyond time and change. They establish a clearly marked path which will enable each individual to attain the peace and enlightenment that is the ultimate goal in life."
More important than the sectarian beliefs that divide us are the great truths that unite us. And these truths have one overriding goal: right action.
An individual's actions cannot help but mirror what is in his mind. You need look no further than a man's behavior to see the extent of his inner development.
As the Dalai Lama observed, "Every major religion of the world has similar ideals of love, the same goal of benefiting humanity through spiritual practice, and the same effect of making their followers into better human beings."
I think that's true. As I witnessed in Las Vegas this week, even a devout believer and a militant atheist can respect each other, love each other, and put their differences behind them. And if they can, what's stopping the rest of us?
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"
