Aspellian wrote:Yes. Shale Gas is now only beginning but its impact could be huge. many N.American ang-mohs are now trying to get into Europe/China to do explorations. New technologies are really increasing the gas reserves by leaps and bounds. US from net importer may even become exporter. Canada will be affected as its main gas export market is USA.
Russia are pushing back its LNG plans on its east coast. If Europe also has significant shale gas, then their dependence on Gazprom will be reduce, which means Russia's GDP will be affected. There could be a real shift in balance of power.
Who knew natural gas would join gold as a safe haven during these troubling times?
Liquefied-natural-gas tankers that can convert the liquid to gas onboard will be in increasing demand in the next 10 years as rising electricity production boosts consumption of the fuel, according to the head of North America’s largest LNG tanker owner.
“The biggest new thing in the LNG area is floating storage regas units,†Peter Evensen, chief executive officer of Hamilton, Bermuda-based Teekay LNG Partners, said in an interview yesterday. “These are ships that cater to a sudden need for gas for power.â€
LNG is gas that’s cooled to a liquid for transport by ship to markets not connected by pipelines. Floating regasification tankers act as LNG import terminals. They can carry LNG to consuming areas, convert it back to gas and send it to local pipelines.
Teekay has identified 30 sites that in the next five years may require floating regasification tankers, including China, Brazil, Dubai, Kuwait, Bangladesh and some islands in Indonesia, said Evensen, who will become chief executive officer of Teekay Corp., Teekay LNG’s parent company, next year.
“That’s probably where you are going to see a lot of incremental traffic,†said Evensen. “We are also seeing more places that burn fuel oil start to switch over to gas.â€
Teekay’s Fleet
There are currently about 15 LNG tankers in the world that can convert LNG to gas, according to Evensen. Teekay said in October that it has acquired a 50 percent interest in one such carrier. The company also owns 15 LNG tankers that don’t have regasification capability.
Evensen said he is pessimistic about the future of U.S. LNG exports because costs are higher than in other producing countries such as Qatar and because distances to gas consumers are longer.
“Gas has a great future in the U.S., but I don’t believe exporting gas from the U.S. has a great future,†said Evensen.
Companies including Cheniere Energy Inc., Freeport LNG Development and Macquarie Group Ltd. have said they are planning to build LNG export terminals in the lower 48 states.
“Today you have Qatar, Malaysia, and Indonesia exporting LNG, but the one that’s going to be huge in the future is Australia,†said Evensen. “There is going to be plenty of gas even before you take into account new LNG projects in Africa.
“If you talk about shipping distances, it’s clearly cheaper to bring gas from Australia, Papua New Guinea, Indonesia, or Malaysia to the big LNG import markets such as Japan, Korea and China.â€
Natural gas for January delivery was little changed at $4.254 per million British thermal units at 9:14 a.m. on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests