Afghanistan orders ban on private security firms By Paul Tait
KABUL (Reuters) - Afghan President Hamid Karzai issued a decree on Tuesday setting a
deadline of four months to disband private security companies, less than a week after Washington expressed some reservations about the plan.
The decree said the private security firms were being banned to avoid the misuse of weapons which had caused "horrific and tragic incidents."
It was issued just hours after Karzai met influential U.S. Senator John Kerry, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
The decree said the order to disband the companies, which employ up to
40,000 people working mainly for Western enterprises in Afghanistan, was being issued "to prevent irregularities."
"I am signing the dissolution of all local and foreign security companies within four months," said the decree, issued by the presidential palace.
The decree
includes an exemption for firms whose guards work inside compounds used by
foreign embassies and international non-government organizations, even though Karzai's office said last week there would be no exceptions.
Firms being disbanded could either sell their weapons to the Afghan government or take the equipment with them as they leave if the companies were properly registered. Unregistered firms would have their weapons confiscated, it said.
The visas of their employees would also be terminated.
Karzai, whose government faces September 18 parliamentary elections, has been trying to assert his independence from his Western backers and stepped up criticism of the firms last week, saying they were too costly and were "daily creating miseries."
The swiftness of the ban appeared to catch some by surprise, especially as it was issued so soon after Karzai met Kerry.
SCANDALS
Karzai has long called for the disbanding of such companies, which compete for
contracts worth billions of dollars, and said last week that time was running out.
The push to scrap the firms is linked to his ambitious
2014 timetable for Afghan forces to take over all security responsibility from foreign forces, who number almost
150,000.The decree said eligible Afghan employees of such firms could volunteer to join the Afghan security forces within the four-month period.
Private security companies, which are not accountable to the Afghan government, have long been an irritant for Afghans and for U.S. and NATO forces in the country after a series of scandals.
The U.S. military also employs some of them and the Pentagon said last week it was in talks with Karzai's government to address its concerns while at the same time ensuring the needs of the U.S. military would be met.
Pentagon spokesman Colonel Dave Lapan said last week it was his impression Karzai had not yet made a decision to scrap all such firms but acknowledged a need to do so over time.
Many Afghans see such firms, most of which are not registered, as operating with impunity,
their heavily armed guards forcing their way through traffic a common sight on Afghan streets.
A senior spokesman for the NATO-led force in Afghanistan acknowledged at the weekend the firms were "a concern" and said they should be properly registered and have binding rules.
Karzai's government tried unsuccessfully last year to register the firms, find out the amount of arms they had and where they came from, and how much money the industry was worth, an Afghan security source has said.
The U.S. State Department said last year it would review its use of contractors at overseas embassies after a scandal over sexual hazing by security guards at its Kabul mission.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6 ... pnewsearly
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"