Semiconductors – Of inflation and geopolitics
In the face of the ongoing tensions between Russia and Ukraine, and looking at the state of affairs within the semiconductor sector, one cannot help but think of the universal Scouts motto: Be Prepared
Ukraine is a major supplier of inert gases like neon, which are key chemicals employed in a major step in the foundry process.
Separately, Russia is also a major producer of palladium, which is used mainly for the semiconductor deposition process.
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has naturally led to concerns among investors about potential supply chain disruptions.
However, major chip companies generally believe that disruptions should be limited for now, given raw material stockpiling and diversified procurement.
Based on 3rd party channel checks, foundries in Asia have accumulated ~6 months of gases inventory prior to the crisis to buffer for any raw material shortages arising from the growth in foundry capacity expansion.
On palladium, we believe that there are alternative sources available (e.g. South Africa, North America), while 3rd party channel checks indicate sufficient channel inventories, which can cover 2-3 quarters.
In our view, the above can also be partly explained by the memories of the exponential increase in neon prices during the Crimea annexation back in 2014. Thus, we believe that the industry has been diversifying their suppliers of essential raw materials/gas since then.
Moving forward, we believe that recent events would prompt players across the semi supply chain to maintain a higher level of inventory for longer, especially with the supply chain uncertainties.
At the same time, we think that companies could also scrutinize their expansion into Eastern Europe or other European countries more closely.
While cost inflation arising from raw materials such as neon or palladium is possible, these are still but small components of the overall cost structure.
Nonetheless, investors should recognize that there is the risk of tensions becoming prolonged, which will invariably have a more pronounced impact as inventories get drawn down.
Apart from the cost pressures arising from the ongoing conflict, investors are also concerned about the impact of inflation (both in the supply chain and across the economy) on semis.
This is understandable: as we have highlighted in our previous report (Global Technology – Navigating through the storm), semis do historically underperform during inflationary periods.
Still, we note a number of encouraging observations. We believe that the semicap equipment names have mostly been able to pass on higher costs (while absorbing some), given the unique nature of the tools they sell (and lack of suitable alternatives other than a few other vendors).
In general, foundries have already raised prices significantly in 2022 (especially TSMC) so they have certainly benefitted in that regard. We should also highlight that broad-based semiconductor firms have been able to retain pricing power and pass higher foundry production costs along to their customers.
All considered, we make no change to our preference for TSMC and Skyworks Solutions within the space, and also add ASML to the list following the recent bout of market weakness.
Source: OCBC