by winston » Fri Apr 22, 2016 7:23 am
Sands China profit falls but uptick seen
Sands China's (1928) first-quarter profit missed analysts' estimates as China's economic slowdown curbed visitor spending.
But chairman Sheldon Adelson predicted future improvement from mass market gamblers and tourists.
Its adjusted property earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization shrank 2.5 percent to US$517.9 million (HK$4.04 billion) from US$531 million a year earlier.
That compares with the US$547 million median estimate of four analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.
From January to March, average daily rate at its flagship resort the Venetian Macao declined by 16.3 percent to US$226 from US$270 as the occupancy rate slid to 77.7 percent from 85.8 percent year on year.
It dragged revenue from hotel room operations 22.5 percent lower.
Earnings from convention, retail and others also plunged 36.2 percent.
Sands China gained the most market share in the first quarter among Macau operators as February's week-long Lunar New Year holiday boosted business, Credit Suisse analysts, led by Kenneth Fong, wrote in a note on Tuesday.
Its focus on the mass market helped lift its share to 23.3 percent from 22.5 percent a quarter earlier, they wrote.
"The mass market has increased. It's performed better, and I think we can look forward to more of that and, as far as non- gaming is concerned, people have to eat, they have to sleep," Adelson said.
"They want to be entertained. I think non-gaming elements will pick up again and do better in the future."
Sands China plans to open its US$2.7 billion Parisian Macao in mid- September, featuring non-gaming aspects such as retail shops and meeting premises besides the casino.
It faces intensifying competition from Wynn Macau (1128), whose project is scheduled to start in June.
"Everything is cyclical we've been in Macau for 12 years now. There have been times over the 12 years that people thought that the business was going down, and then it was going up," he said.
Source: BLOOMBERG
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"