by winston » Fri Jul 18, 2008 1:06 pm
US Properties
How to Play the Real Estate Rebound...
by Louis Basenese
The real estate black hole keeps getting deeper. In the past year, housing starts are down 32.1%. Building permits are down 36.3%. And foreclosures are up 48%.
Even worse, the dastardly mix of tighter lending standards and an increasingly cautious consumer has led to a supply glut. Inventories sit at 4.55 million homes, representing an 11.2-month supply.
So much for the long-believed notion that "real estate always goes up."
The industry giants are feeling the pain, too, right where it hurts the worst - in the wallet...
Collectively, the five largest homebuilders lost $3.4 billion in the latest quarter. No wonder home-builder sentiment is at a 22-year low, according to the latest National Association of Home Builders survey.
It's hard to believe that just three years ago, on July 28, the Philadelphia Housing Sector Index peaked. I remember this well because two days prior - in a stroke of pure, unrepeatable luck - we sold our first home for 88% more than we paid for it 14 months earlier.
I can assure you, however, that my wife and I weren't part of the ill-fated horde that mistook the lucky timing for skill and became full-fledged speculators. Those folks got an expensive lesson in supply and demand dynamics.
But who knew that just days after our windfall gain, the easy lending-induced mania would finally roll over? And today - one subprime fiasco and a credit crunch later - the industry is still paying the price.
All the pain is making value investors salivate. They're just waiting for a telltale sign that the market has finally bottomed.
But we're not going to wait. Because,
1) the clear-cut signal isn't coming, and
2) whether the housing rebound starts tomorrow, next week, or two years from now, it doesn't matter. We can position our portfolios to profit no matter what.
The Federal Reserve Weighs in for a Fight
The latest 127-page Anderson Forecast out of the University of California indicates the leading edge - the California housing market - may be showing the first signs of a recovery.
"The combination of steep price declines, lower interest rates and an easing of the credit crunch may now be bringing bargain-hunter buyers back into the market," said Ryan Ratcliff, an Anderson Forecast economist.
The lagging edge - the Manhattan housing market - might finally be showing signs of cracking. The Big Apple is now littered with price reductions in the middle market (apartments below $1 million), according to a report by Barron's.
So is it time to act on this data and speculate on the coming real estate rebound?
Not so fast. Because fighting in the other corner, we have the University of Wisconsin and the Federal Reserve, whose recent analysis of the real estate market paints a murkier picture.
Their study suggests that the housing bust may only be half over. The study's conclusions are based on very strong data, too - historical rent/price yields, the typical pace of rental growth and the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price index.
My point is that making an airtight case for either side is nearly impossible. Conflicting outlooks are regrettably the norm, not the exception. Just ask CNBC's Maria Bartiromo, who got the lowdown (if you want to call it that) on real estate right from the horse's mouth.
In an interview in March 2007 with the CEOs of homebuilders Toll Brothers and D.R. Horton, Robert Toll said, "It'll be another four or five months before you finally burn off inventory in most of the markets." Guess again!
DR Horton's president and CEO Don Tomnitz, had a different outlook, saying "I don't want to be too sophisticated here, but 2007 is going to suck, all 12 months of the calendar year." Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner!
A Real Estate Turnaround Signal in 2008...
I hate to break the news to you, but no single data point or insider perspective is going to fortuitously signal an unambiguous bottom. Not new home sales... not building permits... not the latest inventory data... nothing. And nobody's going to give us the "all clear," either.
Waiting for irrefutable proof of the turn is flawed anyway. The stock market is a forward-looking beast. When housing prices "officially" bottom, real estate stocks will likely have already run-up in price. But there's a surefire way not to get caught watching the paint dry...
Stick to the tried and true. Buy sound companies and have the discipline to stick to proven asset allocation. It makes all of the market indicators and posturing above pointless.
But that also means committing to owning shares of companies that are out of favor with the investing public. And no sector has been more discarded than real estate.
I suggest a low-risk, low-hassle, low-cost approach. Leave active management behind and consider the Vanguard REIT Index (VGSIX). It will give you the broadest real estate exposure possible for an almost negligible expense ratio of 0.2%.
Public Storage and Equity Residential Properties are among its top five holdings. Both have returned over 12% this year. The fund also maintains consistent dividend strength, yielding more than 5% right now.
And here's another little portfolio-boosting secret: This year's big losers are often next year's Wall Street darlings. Historical data bears that out. And so will holding a part of your portfolio in real estate.
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"