Hutchison Port

Hutchison Port

Postby LenaHuat » Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:28 pm

From MingBao, the reason why LiKaShing is listing a biz trust in SGX:-
【明報專訊】屢屢把握高位沽貨的李嘉誠,再次施展財技「賣產」。他擔任主席的和記黃埔(0013),昨日公布打算把香港和深圳貨櫃碼頭資產分拆到新加坡上市,只會保留小量股權,市場估計可套現三四百億元。和黃今次不惜大幅度減持珠三角兩大港口主要權益,卻保留長三角港口資產,被視為看淡珠三角區域的出口前景。

IMHO, when the Burmese opens up their country, HK's port will be adversely affected. So will our PSA.
Please be forewarned that you are reading a post by an otiose housewife. ImageImage**Image**Image@@ImageImageImage
User avatar
LenaHuat
Big Boss
 
Posts: 3228
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:35 am

Re: HK - Economic Data & News

Postby kennynah » Thu Jan 20, 2011 2:03 am

dear L :

on the matter of seaport...

singapore's premium position may not last forever...well, nothing material lasts forever anyways...

when and if thailand should decide to build a "suez", i can almost guarantee that PSA/Keppel will go belly up immediately...
Options Strategies & Discussions .(Trading Discipline : The Science of Constantly Acting on Knowledge Consistently - kennynah).Investment Strategies & Ideas

Image..................................................................<A fool gives full vent to his anger, but a wise man keeps himself under control-Proverbs 29:11>.................................................................Image
User avatar
kennynah
Lord of the Lew Lian
 
Posts: 16005
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 2:00 am
Location: everywhere.. and nowhere..

Re: HK - Economic Data & News

Postby LenaHuat » Thu Jan 20, 2011 8:54 am

Hi K :D
Thailand can no longer build a Suez canal because the southern states of Narathiwat, Yala and Pattani has a severe Islamist militancy issue. Many Thais have fled the region. If you track Myanmar affairs, you will find that the army has been driving the minority tribes across the border to Thailand and China. In particular the Karens of the south has been forcibly evicted from the southern part bordering Thailand because of the oil pipes to China. The Burmese sea gypsies have also fled to Malaysia and Bangladesh. The lowland Burmese are nursing a Suez Canal dream, which is likely to be $$sponsored by the rich Chinese :D

When the Burmese port and oil pipes are completed, PSA International is unlikely to go belly up because the Japanese, Vietnamese, and other ASEAN countries will continue to use the Singapore port. Certainly, the US navy will :lol: .So the future is not that bleak.
Please be forewarned that you are reading a post by an otiose housewife. ImageImage**Image**Image@@ImageImageImage
User avatar
LenaHuat
Big Boss
 
Posts: 3228
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:35 am

Re: HK - Economic Data & News

Postby kennynah » Thu Jan 20, 2011 4:57 pm

dear L...thanks for the assessment...

i hope we can maintain our port relevance... if not, eat grass liao...
Options Strategies & Discussions .(Trading Discipline : The Science of Constantly Acting on Knowledge Consistently - kennynah).Investment Strategies & Ideas

Image..................................................................<A fool gives full vent to his anger, but a wise man keeps himself under control-Proverbs 29:11>.................................................................Image
User avatar
kennynah
Lord of the Lew Lian
 
Posts: 16005
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 2:00 am
Location: everywhere.. and nowhere..

Re: Port Operators

Postby LenaHuat » Thu Jan 20, 2011 9:22 pm

Here's the link on news about the new oil and gas pipelines from Myanmar to Yunan, China:-
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-06/04/content_9936239.htm

The port is being deepened for oil tankers to call. Land is also being cleared for the transportation of Myanmar's natural gas to China.
Please be forewarned that you are reading a post by an otiose housewife. ImageImage**Image**Image@@ImageImageImage
User avatar
LenaHuat
Big Boss
 
Posts: 3228
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:35 am

Re: Port Operators

Postby LenaHuat » Fri Jan 21, 2011 8:53 am

Hutchinson is letting go of its Pearl River Delta ports (HK and Guangzhou) but keeping its Yangtze River ports. The dominance of Shanghai will go from strength to strength. Foxconn, IBM, HP are already operating big factories out of ChongQing where it's cheap and easy to move goods down the Yangtze River to Shanghai. From Shanghai, they are exported to Japan and US. Last year, in the "Canada" thread, I wrote about the Canadian government investing big sums in developing the ports around Vancouver. Buffet is investing big in rails because it is cheap too to move goods along the northern belts from Virginia>Chicago>Seattle/Vancouver>Tokyo/Yokohama/Shanghai.

Secondly, China is transforming her economy to be less reliant on exports. Right now, the domestic economy is some 30% and it would likely take her 20 years to grow it to ard 60-70% of total GDP, identical to the US. Hence, the importance of the Pearl River delta region will diminish.

The Hutchinson listing, as a biz trust in SGX will be a good yield play for only the next 10 years or so.
My 1 cent :lol:
Please be forewarned that you are reading a post by an otiose housewife. ImageImage**Image**Image@@ImageImageImage
User avatar
LenaHuat
Big Boss
 
Posts: 3228
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:35 am

Hutchison Port Holdings Trust IPO

Postby winston » Fri Jan 21, 2011 6:55 pm

HPH Trust is no loss to HK
21st January 2011

There's been much hand-wringing amongst legislators and media in HK this week about "losing out" to Singapore as a choice of listing for yet another spin-off of Hutchison Whampoa Ltd (HWL, 0013), this time the South China ports business of its 80% subsidiary, Hutchison Port Holdings Ltd (HPH, BVI). We don't think HK is losing out at all, and it would be a loss if HK were to lower its standards to attract such business, as we will explain.

The proposed spin-off involves creating a Business Trust (BT) under the Singapore Business Trust Act of 2004 (BTA), called Hutchison Port Holdings Trust (HPH Trust). The world hasn't exactly been rushing to create BTs - there are only 10 currently, over 6 years since the enactment in 2004. The first, Pacific Shipping Trust, was listed on 26-May-2006.

The Trustee-Manager (TM) of HPH Trust will be Hutchison Port Holdings Management Pte Ltd (HPH Management), which will be 100% owned by HWL, not by HPH. That cuts the 20% minority shareholder of HPH, PSA International Pte Ltd (PSA) out of the management fees.

http://webb-site.com/articles/hutchport.asp
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"
User avatar
winston
Billionaire Boss
 
Posts: 118906
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:28 am

Re: Hutchison Port Holdings Trust IPO

Postby LenaHuat » Sun Jan 23, 2011 9:45 pm

To understand more about the implications of a business trust, this could be helpful:-
http://www.cityspring.com.sg/about_bus.html
Please be forewarned that you are reading a post by an otiose housewife. ImageImage**Image**Image@@ImageImageImage
User avatar
LenaHuat
Big Boss
 
Posts: 3228
Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:35 am

Re: Hutchison Port Holdings Trust IPO

Postby winston » Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:12 pm

UPDATE 1-Hutchison unit sets price range for $5.8 bln Singapore IPO

* Price range of $0.91-$1.08 a unit - prospectus
* To sell up to 3.9 billion units, excluding cornerstones
* Temasek, Paulson, Cathay Life among cornerstones
* Cornerstones to invest $1.6 billion

By Saeed Azhar and Charmian Kok SINGAPORE, Feb 28 (Reuters) - Hutchison Whampoa's <0013.HK> ports' unit is looking to raise as much as $5.8 billion in its Singapore initial public offering, making it the biggest listing in Southeast Asia.

Hutchison Port Holdings has set an indicative price of $0.91 to $1.08 per unit for the IPO, aiming to raise $4.2 billion through the sale share. Cornerstone investors will be putting in an additional $1.6 billion in the deal, according to its preliminary prospectus.

Based on the maximum indicative price, the market cap of the company will be $9.4 billion after the listing, which is likely to be within a few weeks.

Singapore state investor Temasek Holdings [TEM.UL], U.S. hedge fund manager Paulson & Co and Cathay Life Insurance are among the cornerstone investors.

The listing by Hutchison, a ports-to-telecom conglomerate owned by Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-shing, is the first publicly traded business trust backed by port assets, according to its prospectus.

The company chose Singapore over Hong Kong because the city-state has been an attractive destination for infrastructure and real estate trusts, bankers said.

The units will offer a yield of between 5.5 percent to 6.5 percent to unit holders, according to the prospectus.

Paulson will invest $350 million in the IPO, whereas a Temasek unit will put in $100 million.

"Given the size of HPH Trust, we expect the proposed IPO to attract significant investor interest," said Sean Quek, Singapore head of research at Credit Suisse.

"In addition to the potential direct impact on trading volume, the IPO could also set the path for business trusts and port-related companies' listing here." DBS , Deutsche Bank , and Goldman Sachs are joint bookrunners and issue managers.

JPMorgan , UBS , Barclays , Morgan Stanley are among co-lead managers.


Source: Reuters
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"
User avatar
winston
Billionaire Boss
 
Posts: 118906
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:28 am

Hutchison Port Holdings

Postby tonylim » Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:56 am

Do read page 64 of the IPO prospectus as follows:-


It highlights that port operation license is renewal every 3 years
and is not guaranteed
"

The ports industry in the PRC is a highly regulated industry.

The PRC port industry is highly regulated. Operators are required to obtain a port operation licence, which has to be renewed every three years (which requires certain requirements to be fulfilled), as well as to comply with strict regulations in respect of, among other things, operational management, supervision, inspection and the loading, unloading and storage of hazardous goods.

Although the Trustee-Manager does not expect to have any difficulties in obtaining or renewing the port operation licences, there is no assurance that future applications to obtain or to renew the licence will always be approved.

Any failure by HPH Trust to obtain or renew its port operation licence would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

In addition, as a result of terrorist activities and increased security concerns, there is a global move towards increased inspection procedures and tighter import/export controls and safety regulations.

If the compliance costs of any new regulations or procedures cannot be recovered through higher ports fees and charges, the operating margins of HPH Trust may be adversely affected."


"RISKS RELATING TO THE PORT INDUSTRY

HPH Trust’s inability to maintain and renew concession agreements or government approvals may adversely affect HPH Trust.

Substantially all terminal operations in the container terminal industry are conducted pursuant to long-term operating concessions or leases entered into between a terminal operator and the owner of the land on which the port is situated, typically a government entity.

Concession agreements often contain clauses that allow the owner of the land on which the port is situated to cancel the agreement or impose penalties if specified obligations are not fulfilled.

Similarly, because many of the counterparts to concession agreements are government entities, HPH Trust is subject to the risk that concession agreements may be cancelled because of political, social or economic instability or conditions.

Ports are often viewed by governments as critical national assets and sentiment changes may affect port concessions. There can be no assurance that one or more of the existing concession agreements will not be prematurely cancelled or that HPH Trust will not be penalised, with or without cause, by the applicable counterparty.

In advance of the expiration of a concession agreement, the owner of the land on which the port is situated will typically agree to renew the concession with the existing concessionaire, but often only after significant renegotiation that usually involves, among other things, a commitment on the part of the concessionaire to make a capital expenditure with respect to the relevant operation.

There can be no assurance that the concession agreements will be renewed upon their expiration on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, or that HPH Trust would be the winning bidder in any re-tender of one or more of the existing concessions should the relevant port owner elect not to renew the relevant concession with HPH Trust.

In the PRC, terminal operations in the container terminal industry are conducted pursuant to approval from the PRC Government (as defined herein). YICT, YICTP3 and SYWPT operate Yantian based upon the port operation permits issued by the port authority and approvals from the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce.

The Port Law of the PRC and other relevant regulations authorise the port authority to impose penalties or even revoke the port operation permits if an enterprise engaging in port operation violates certain specified obligations.

HPH Trust is subject to the risk that the port operation approvals may be cancelled or changed by the PRC Government due to political, social, military, economic instability or conditions.

The operation terms of YICT, YICTP3 and SYWPT have been specified in their current business licences. Any extension of such operation terms will be subject to the approval of the PRC Government. There can be no assurance that the operation terms of YICT, YICTP3 and SYWPT will be automatic"
查颜观色,静观其变,审时度世.
User avatar
tonylim
Boss' Left Hand Person
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 9:39 am

Next

Return to H to K

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests