The answer might lie somewhere more difficult to dissect
By James Brumley
It feels a little unnatural to criticize the icon of value investing, particularly when he’s got a superior long-term track record. On the other hand, when arguably the wisest fund manager on the planet starts to trail the market’s average performance on a regular basis, even the most patient of investors is going to start second-guessing the guy making the picks.
It’s What You Can’t See That Matters Most
It’s a reality that’s rarely discussed about Berkshire’s structure, but it’s actually a fund (sort of) made up of both publicly traded companies as well as privately held ones.
We can wrap our hands around the publicly traded ones pretty well. It’s the privately held names here, however, that might be the biggest reason for the three-year struggle.
Bottom Line
Warren Buffett remains a great investor, but he’s not infallible.
What’s interesting about the past three years is that Buffett paid dearly for a couple of the privately held companies that might be failing Berkshire now.
Namely, he paid 31% more than the going price for the 2010 acquisition of railroad Burlington Northern Santa Fe, and offered a 28% premium for Lubrizol last year. And given the bids, odds are those are not the only businesses he overpaid for — they and Conoco are just the ones we readily recall.
Simply put, when the man himself takes “value†out of value investing, lagging performance shouldn’t be a surprise.
http://www.investorplace.com/2012/05/wh ... en=3879240