not vested
Singapore Airlines said it filled 68.5 percent of the available space on its planes in July, lower than 69.9 percent in June and 70.2 percent a year ago.
Source: Reuters
winston wrote:Not vested
How much is SIA losing on the Virgin Atlantic deal ? US$600m ?
...
“Delta will buy the 49 percent shareholding for $360 million, according to a stock exchange filling late yesterday. Singapore Air will book an S$322 million ($264 million) gain from the sale, after accounting for a writedown in its investment in the U.K. carrier controlled by billionaire Richard Branson…Singapore Air bought the stake for S$1.65 billion, Germaine Shen, a spokeswoman, said by e-mail.”
To summarize the article: Singapore Airlines buys its 49% stake in Virgin Atlantic for $1.65 billion SGD, sells it for $360 million, and books a profit of $322 million SGD. Only through extremely shady accounting can a company buy an asset for $1.65 billion and sell it for a $1.3 billion less but record a $322 million profit. Let’s explain how this is possible.
Because Virgin Atlantic is a private company, its shares are not publicly traded on an exchange and provide no public record to value the stake. Singapore Airlines therefore, marked the value of its Virgin Atlantic holding on its balance sheet based upon what it believed it could sell the shares for on the open market. So in the most technical of ways, Singapore Airlines is completely within its accounting rights to book a profit on this transaction.
However, a closer look reveals some very disturbing trends and patterns. First, to book a profit of $322 million SGD on a sale of $360 million, Singapore Airline implicitly valued the Virgin Atlantic stake at $38 million SGD. This means that Singapore Airlines was valuing its Virgin stake at 98% less than what is paid for it. Booking “profits” like this eventually cause a firm to go bankrupt.
....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests