Investment Myths Busted

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby winston » Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:25 pm

I'm playing Devil's advocate here :twisted: :lol:

MM: A simple question. If a stock you are looking at has a PE ratio of 6 and growing at a reasonable 10-15% a year, with low debts, would you buy it ?


No, I will only buy companies that are growing at > 20%.

I'm not so sure that Institutional Support is the issue. If one has a Stop Loss, one would not really get into a lot of trouble.

WRT to buying the stock now ( PE 3 ), since there is no institutional support, the only things left is, for it being taken private or by another company.

And the only way for it to happen is that it's PEG would need to be very compelling..

And it may also be a very long wait.. :D
It's all about "how much you made when you were right" & "how little you lost when you were wrong"
User avatar
winston
Billionaire Boss
 
Posts: 111924
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:28 am

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby millionairemind » Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:43 pm

winston wrote:I'm playing Devil's advocate here :twisted: :lol:


Reverse devil's advocate :lol: :lol:

When 2007 results were released, the net profit grew 60% YOY :P

http://info.sgx.com/webcoranncatth.nsf/ ... penelement

I know cos' I made money from this company last year ;)

But then hor, last year SUPER BULL RUN, a monkey anyhow throw darts oso make more money than me:D
"If a speculator is correct half of the time, he is hitting a good average. Even being right 3 or 4 times out of 10 should yield a person a fortune if he has the sense to cut his losses quickly on the ventures where he has been wrong" - Bernard Baruch

Disclaimer - The author may at times own some of the stocks mentioned in this forum. All discussions are NOT to be construed as buy/sell recommendations. Readers are advised to do their own research and analysis.
User avatar
millionairemind
Big Boss
 
Posts: 7776
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 8:50 am
Location: The Matrix

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby helios » Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:33 pm

MM ge,

does the I = Institutional Support apply to RTO situations?

other than privatised, or takeover, or mergers are pretty common ... ?

thanks in advance.
helios
Permanent Loafer
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 8:30 am

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby iam802 » Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:51 pm

San,

if I understand CANSlim and your question correctly...

the answer should be no.

CANSlim is more of a trend trading approach.

RTO is one-off, ad-hoc stuffs. You won't know when it is coming. Unless, you associate the hiring of ML to look for buyers etc as institutional support, then that might change the interpretation.

Not too sure if my answers make sense as well.
1. Always wait for the setup. NO SETUP; NO TRADE

2. The trend will END but I don't know WHEN.

TA and Options stuffs on InvestIdeas:
The Ichimoku Thread | Option Strategies Thread | Japanese Candlesticks Thread
User avatar
iam802
Big Boss
 
Posts: 5940
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 1:14 am

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby helios » Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:56 pm

Yuppz, sense and sensational!
helios
Permanent Loafer
 
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 8:30 am

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby sidney » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:04 am

Dear MM, in your opinion, is institutional support in certan shares gd or no gd for stocks i intend to hold till my grandchildren come out:)?

Since fund mgr can prop up share price by exiting and entry.. and thus the lemmings (certain retail investors jump trampolin) in and out also, thus the volaitity is actually thru speculation, not true valuation of the underlying biz fundamentals.

Is it better that the stock is left untouched and left market adjust the share price to true valuation in long run prespective?
Tempered.
User avatar
sidney
Foreman
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 10:24 pm

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby la papillion » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:29 am

Devil's advocate III :)
------------------------------

Well...let me try to piece up a feeble defence. I have no presumption that I know anything. But firstly, I don't buy just based on PE. In fact, PE is just one of the way I used to calculate the rough range in which the stock will trade. It will never be a valid reason to buy just based entirely on PE. To me, it's a little over-rated. Secondly, it just got IPO-ed on 8th August 2007, meaning that it's just slightly short of 1 year. I personally won't buy IPO stocks (because no matter how much I tikam, I always didn't get any lots!) because the results could be adjusted to 'prepare' for the IPO. I prefer to have it for 5 years at least to have a feel of the company's business before even entering it.

I tried to search for China Hongcheng results - they only have from FY06 to FY07, and 1st to 3rd quarter FY08. Let me ignore quarterly results for now.

Image
http://bp3.blogger.com/_3qF-4FCPF1I/SJC ... gcheng.gif


I hate doing companies with very short history. Since FY06 is pre-IPO, we mustn't treat it too seriously - this means only one year worth of data.

At first glance, seems like this company's business is doing well. With a gross margin of around 29% and a net margin of 16-17%, it seems rather profitable. ROE of 50%, that's very very high. Let's break down ROE of into 3 components:

1. Financial leverage : Total assets/Total equities

2. Asset turnover: Total revenue/Total assets

3. Net margin: Net profit/Total revenue

ROE = Financial leverage x asset turnover x net margins

Yr---------Financial leverage-------Asset turnover-------Net margins-----------ROE

FY07------------4.56--------------------0.70---------------16.7%----------------53.3%
FY06------------6.78--------------------0.64---------------12.8%----------------55.4%

Seems like the reason for their high ROE is from their leveraged structure. Indeed, looking at the current and quick ratio suggest a rather low figure. Total debts to equity paints an even worse picture. If I'm interested in the company, I would do a comp study on other similar companies. Take note that the below comp table is lifted from their presentation slides, dated Oct, 2007. I wonder what the PE of the comparable companies will be like now. Perhaps it will show that Hongcheng at PE of 6x or even current PE of 3x isn't that fantastic.

Image
http://bp3.blogger.com/_3qF-4FCPF1I/SJC ... -30_hc.gif


We can see that the ROE of china hongcheng is one of the highest. But we must break up the ROE to see if the ROE of the other comparables are boosted by high borrowings or not. I'm looking for good ROE without excessive leverage here, as it is a double edged sword, much like margin trading.

Below is the price to EPS (SGD) for China hongcheng,

Year------price(high)----price(lowest)----EPS---------PE(high)-------PE(low)
2008-------0.35-----------0.185--
2007-------0.58-----------0.33------------$0.066----------8.8------------5.0

* note that highest and lowest price is the closing price, not the intraday high or low
** EPS is in SGD


Data of historical PE is too little to be of much use - that's one of the reason why I won't buy IPO stocks with less than 5 years of history behind them.

One thing that screams loudly as I was browsing through is the fact that around 70% of their revenue comes from overseas in FY07 and of that amount, 42.4% comes from US. That's like 30% of their revenues from from US. I'm wondering if their business will be affected adversely should US suffers a slowdown or recession in their economy. Hmm, food for thought.

Of their business, their should start to increase selling more bed linens. My goodness, those have a gross margin of 41%, but takes up only 8.3% of revenue. Most of the product revenue comes from selling grey and dyed cotton fabrics (53.8% of revenue), which earns a gross margin of 21%. Didn't know bed linens can earn so much :)

I guess that's my feeble defense. I don't even think it's a defense, haha, I'm just thinking out loud on this company. I anyhow anyhow did some valuation, using 10 yrs with no terminal value, discount rate of 8% and EPS growth of just 10% (it's around 20%) - I get around $0.80 per share. Seems like good value at current price of $0.20 - I'll likely get like 15% returns in 10 yrs. But this company is too young to be sure. As long as the EPS grows up by than 10%, I think roughly roughly lah.

Don't hurt me too badly, millionairemind :)
An investment operation is one which, upon thorough analysis promises safety of principal and an adequate return - Benjamin Graham
User avatar
la papillion
Boss' Left Hand Person
 
Posts: 598
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 2:10 pm

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby millionairemind » Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:47 am

Aiyo La pap,

Who in the right mind would want to hurt you :D????

YOu are my friend, as in everyone here...We are all here to learn and share. I learn from you and I share with you what little I know.

Devil's Advocate IV :evil: :D

So based on your 80cts valuation, you would think that 50cts is good entry??? High MOS? How about when it drifted to 40cts? Then 30cts???

You get my point... :lol:

I am here just to debunk the myth that just because a stock is cheap with PE of 5 does not mean it will not get any cheaper and be careful of analysts who keep harping "THE VALUATIONS ARE UNDEMANDING kind of crap"...that is all :)

Continue posting.. I am enjoying your insightful posts :)
"If a speculator is correct half of the time, he is hitting a good average. Even being right 3 or 4 times out of 10 should yield a person a fortune if he has the sense to cut his losses quickly on the ventures where he has been wrong" - Bernard Baruch

Disclaimer - The author may at times own some of the stocks mentioned in this forum. All discussions are NOT to be construed as buy/sell recommendations. Readers are advised to do their own research and analysis.
User avatar
millionairemind
Big Boss
 
Posts: 7776
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 8:50 am
Location: The Matrix

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby Musicwhiz » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:00 am

Yeah analysts are "famous" for saying "valuations are undemanding" without really understanding the business itself. Modifying Buffett's quote: "We all would be bums on the street with tin cups if we listened to analysts !". :lol:

P.S. - Wow, I hit a 100 posts and have officially become a "coolie". Feels good to be a manual worker at last instead of a "loafer". :P
Please visit my value investing blog at http://sgmusicwhiz.blogspot.com
User avatar
Musicwhiz
Boss' Right Hand Person
 
Posts: 1239
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 2:02 am

Re: Investment Myths Busted

Postby millionairemind » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:38 am

Wah MW!!! Welcome to Coolie status!! :D

Hope you become Towkay by next year (around 2000posts, I think)

Huat huat 2008 ar!!! :D
"If a speculator is correct half of the time, he is hitting a good average. Even being right 3 or 4 times out of 10 should yield a person a fortune if he has the sense to cut his losses quickly on the ventures where he has been wrong" - Bernard Baruch

Disclaimer - The author may at times own some of the stocks mentioned in this forum. All discussions are NOT to be construed as buy/sell recommendations. Readers are advised to do their own research and analysis.
User avatar
millionairemind
Big Boss
 
Posts: 7776
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 8:50 am
Location: The Matrix

PreviousNext

Return to Other Investment Instruments & Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests