The Jakarta Post
Editorial: Redefining nationalism Mon, 05/19/2008 11:51 AM
As we mark a century of national awakening this week, here is a question worth pondering: Where is Indonesia going to be 100 years from now?
Will Indonesia remain a nation stuck in abject poverty and backwardness? Will Indonesia implode, dissolve or break up into smaller states sometime in the next 100 years because of its inherent contradictions? Or will Indonesia become one of the greatest nations on earth, not only prosperous, but also leading the world in the economic fields, science, art and sports, and playing a major role in helping promote global security and prosperity?
Of the three scenarios, the last is the most desirable. And Indonesia certainly has the potential to be a great nation. But this means that any notion of nationalism today must be couched in terms of making Indonesia a nation that is on par with the most advance countries in the world.
Imagine what it would mean for the economy if all the people of working age were gainfully employed, contributing to the gross domestic product. Imagine the richness of the diversity of the country's people, cultures and traditions, and how together they could contribute to the pursuit of science, knowledge and the advancement of humanity.
And imagine the abundance of natural resources, renewable and otherwise, being used efficiently and productively for the good of the national and global economy. Only a few other countries on earth are probably as blessed as Indonesia.
However, the same assets that could potentially make Indonesia a great nation instead have become liabilities or curses that have held us back. Our huge population has meant we are constantly struggling to produce enough food and to create jobs that would provide people with a decent income.
The diversity of our population has meant that we are constantly fighting one another or suspicious of one another because of our differences.
And the wealth of natural resources has led to greed and corruption, particularly among those who control them, impoverishing the rest of us.
A century ago, our founding fathers launched a movement that sought independence for a collection of peoples living in the archipelago then called the Dutch East Indies. Driven by this spirit of nationalism, their movement culminated with Indonesia's proclamation of independence in 1945, and a formal end to three-and-half centuries of Dutch colonialism five years later.
With independence secured, our leaders put forward a new vision of a just and prosperous society and of a country playing a role in the promotion of global peace and prosperity. This is written in the Preamble to the 1945 Constitution. More than 60 years later, however, this vision of Indonesia has remained a distant dream.
Instead, independent Indonesia has wasted six precious decades through petty fights and power struggles, followed by a long period of corrupt and violent dictatorship until 1998. We have made little progress.
It is like we have been stuck in second gear all this time. While undoubtedly the nation has made some progress in the intervening years, it is failing behind other countries in Asia that only gained their independence much later than Indonesia.
So, whither nationalism?
The same nationalism that fired up the struggle for independence somehow failed to rekindle the spirit as Indonesia embarked upon nation building.
And in spite of its touted potential, Indonesia has never turned into a great nation.
A big part of the problem lies in our failure to redefine the concept of nationalism. We have hardly departed from the concept that set us on the path to independence in the first half of the 20th century. Today, nationalism still carries xenophobic sentiments. While this may have had its merits during the struggle against Dutch colonialism, surely this definition of nationalism lost its essence the moment Indonesia became an independent nation, and especially today in a globalized world.
Instead of being a rallying point to move the nation forward, nationalism in the hands of leaders in independent Indonesia today has became a tool for narrow political objectives. Nationalism has become exclusive rather than inclusive, something that divides rather than unites. If nationalism is to remain a driving force, we need to come up with a new national consensus of what we mean by it.
In all honesty, looking at the condition of Indonesia today, there is really little to celebrate in marking the centenary of National Awakening Day. Rather than squandering time and resources to mark our meager achievements, we should probably use this occasion to contemplate the direction of this nation.
Implosion is certainly a possible scenario, just as it is possible for Indonesia to become a great nation in the next 100 years.
But for that to happen, we need to redefine our understanding of the term nationalism into one that looks at the larger interests of the nation, including Indonesia's place on the international stage. The old brand of nationalism that has xenophobic overtones no longer has a place in modern Indonesia.
Will Indonesia be able to fulfill its vision as a great nation? To borrow the government's slogan for the centenary commemoration of national awakening, yes, Indonesia Bisa (Indonesia Can).